Home health agencies need RCD pre-claim review support when the volume and precision of pre-claim packets outgrow what clinical, intake, and billing teams can reliably deliver alongside patient care. Under the Review Choice Demonstration (RCD), every 30-day billing period needs complete, consistent documentation before the final claim, and gaps can lead to non-affirmations, denied claims, or payment reductions. RCD pre-claim review services cannot guarantee affirmation or payment, but they add a structured quality check before submission. This article covers where agencies struggle, when to build in-house versus outsource, and how to evaluate a provider. For program basics, start with our complete guide to RCD pre-claim review.
Last verified against CMS guidance on November 5, 2026. Confirm current requirements with CMS and your Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC).
Under Choice 1, an agency submits a pre-claim review request for each 30-day period and waits for a decision, which the CMS Operational Guide says the MAC issues within 10 business days. A claim that should carry a Unique Tracking Number (UTN) but does not is stopped for prepayment review, and if it is found payable it takes a 25% payment reduction that is not appealable.
Performance also determines your future options. Agencies reaching a full affirmation rate of at least 90% over a six-month cycle, with at least 10 requests, can move to selective postpayment review or spot check review. Agencies below that line return to the two initial choices. RCD currently covers Illinois, Ohio, Texas, North Carolina, Florida, and Oklahoma, and CMS has announced California for billing periods beginning on or after January 18, 2027, pending approval of a Paperwork Reduction Act revision. California agencies face a choice selection window from November 16 to December 16, 2026.
Pre-claim review is less a single task than a chain of handoffs. Common pressure points include:
The medical record must support that the patient is homebound, under a physician’s care, receiving services under a physician-established plan of care, in need of skilled services, and supported by a qualifying face-to-face encounter. Most avoidable problems start at one of those five points:
It helps to separate two outcomes. A rejected request has missing or invalid information, such as a wrong MAC, an invalid MBI, or no clinical documentation, and it is not reviewed for medical necessity. A non-affirmed request was reviewed and did not show that coverage requirements were met. When documentation errors are the cause, the MAC calls the agency to provide education and encourage a resubmission, but the agency still loses time.
A claim submitted with a non-affirmed UTN is denied. Ordinary appeal rights apply, but RCD has no separate appeal for the pre-claim decision itself. Resubmitting restarts the 10-business-day clock and delays billing.
Non-affirmations also affect your standing. Only fully affirmed decisions count toward a pre-claim review affirmation rate. As a simple illustration, an agency that submits 20 requests in a cycle needs at least 18 fully affirmed to reach 90%. A few avoidable errors can decide whether the agency earns relief or stays in pre-claim review.
Provisional affirmation helps, but it is not a guarantee of payment. CMS notes that an affirmed claim can still be denied for technical requirements checked after submission or for information not available at the time of review.
A clean pre-claim packet starts well before submission. Admission details from intake, accurate OASIS assessments, physician orders, and the face-to-face record all feed the packet. Billing then has to apply the right UTN to the right claim and keep the agency’s billing process aligned with the decision. Agencies that treat pre-claim review as a billing task alone often discover clinical documentation problems too late to fix them cheaply.
A proactive review catches problems while the clinician can still correct the record. A practical process includes:
Building in-house gives you direct control and close knowledge of your patients. It requires dedicated reviewer time, current knowledge of CMS and MAC rules, and enough capacity to hold up during growth, turnover, or leave.
Outsourcing brings specialized review experience, scalability, and a fresh set of eyes on documentation your team wrote. The trade-offs are cost, coordination with an outside team, and the need for safe, timely access to patient records.
A hybrid model often fits best: an internal owner manages submissions and decisions while an outside reviewer checks packets before they go out. Outside help is worth a closer look when your team is stretched, your non-affirmations are repeating, you are entering RCD for the first time, or you are growing quickly.
Expert support cannot change what happened clinically or promise a decision. Realistic benefits include earlier detection of documentation gaps, more consistent standards across clinicians, reduced administrative burden on clinical staff, practical education on what reviewers look for, and clearer visibility into trends before a review cycle closes.
Ask any provider you are considering:
Trilogy Quality Assurance is owned and operated by registered nurses and works with home health and hospice agencies. Its pre-claim review service includes OASIS review, plan of care validation, homebound status confirmation, visit note and clinical documentation review, face-to-face verification, and pre-claim packet assembly. The firm states that its operations are HIPAA compliant and that every client receives oversight from one of its owners. Related services include chart QA, assistance with ADRs, and quarterly audits.
Trilogy Quality Assurance is an independent company and is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare, or any Medicare Administrative Contractor.
They are outside support for the pre-claim process under the Review Choice Demonstration, typically documentation review, readiness checks, and packet preparation, so requests are complete before they reach the MAC.
Consider it when internal capacity is stretched, non-affirmations repeat, the agency is new to RCD or growing quickly, or no one owns pre-claim review end to end.
No. The MAC makes the decision, and even a provisional affirmation is not a guarantee of payment. Treat any guarantee as a warning sign.
A rejected request had missing or invalid information and was not reviewed for medical necessity. A non-affirmed request was reviewed and did not show that Medicare coverage requirements were met.
It can be when the provider signs a Business Associate Agreement and follows documented safeguards. Trilogy states that its operations are HIPAA compliant and that it handles documents securely.
Its service page lists OASIS review, plan of care validation, homebound status confirmation, visit note review, face-to-face verification, and pre-claim packet assembly.
Health care is a vital aspect of maintaining overall well-being, encompassing a range of services from preventive care
(502) 203-1347
